Logo

Toyota Urban Cruiser (2009 - 2014) vs. Mitsubishi Colt (2005 - 2010) Compare Car Dimensions Side by Side

Cars comparison grid backgroundMitsubishi ColtToyota Urban Cruiser
393 cm (Toyota)
387.5 cm (Mitsubishi)
152.5 cm
145.3 cm
Swap comparison carsSwap
Toyota Urban Cruiser

Toyota

Urban Cruiser

2009 - 2014

Change car

Mitsubishi Colt

Mitsubishi

Colt

2005 - 2010

Change car

Toyota Urban Cruiser (2009 - 2014) is larger by 5.5 cm and higher by 7.2 cm compared to Mitsubishi Colt (2005 - 2010). It has ground clearance lower by 0.9 cm and cargo volume is smaller by 46%

Length

Length

+1%
393 cm
387.5 cm

A longer body means it might be more challenging to maneuver in tight spaces, but could offer more interior space.

Width

Width

+2%
172.5 cm
169.5 cm

The wider body provides more shoulder room for passengers but may be more challenging in tight parking spots.

Height

Height

+5%
152.5 cm
145.3 cm

The taller height typically means better headroom and easier entry/exit, but may affect garage height clearance.

Wheelbase

Wheelbase

+2%
246 cm
250 cm

A shorter wheelbase usually means better maneuverability, though it might affect interior space.

Ground Clearance

Ground Clearance

+6%
14 cm
14.9 cm

Lower ground clearance typically improves handling and makes entry/exit easier, but requires more caution on rough terrain.

Weight

Weight

+8%
1195 kg
1110 kg

Greater weight can provide better stability but may impact fuel efficiency and performance.

Cargo Volume

Cargo Volume

+46%
314 l
460 l

The smaller cargo space means less room for luggage when all seats are in use.

Price EU

Price EU

+3%
16102
16616

The lower price point could offer better value for similar features.

Price US

Price US

$--
$--

Price comparison not available due to missing data.